Mission Impossible Fallout review – Fake outs upon fake outs!

Mission-impossible-fallout-movie-logo

“YOU CAN’T FIGHT THE FRICTION!!!” These were the memorable lines of one of the songs used for the teaser trailer. For many film goers, this signifies an improvement over the previous films in the franchise, and in many ways, it does actually deliver on that promise. To them it was a direct reminder of things to come.

If you haven’t heard already (or have been living under a rock this entire time), Mission Impossible Fallout is the 6th instalment in the Mission Impossible franchise. Much like the previous works, Fallout expands upon the whole team-based spy fiction subgenre that had been brought to fruition ever since its 1st outing. Unlike the James Bond films, Mission Impossible has always been about teamwork in the field, rather than dressing up in suave outfits and seducing chicks on various solo missions. Ethan Hunt is almost always going to be cooperating with his group of highly trained IMF agents, rather than Bond who just barges into a room all by himself to dish out some collateral damage. That already distinguishes it from its more successful parent franchise. Sorry Mission Impossible, you’re still a young lad.

mission impossible 1
Tom Cruise failing to hide that pimple of his.

Now I’m not going to touch upon the characters or the story as much like I do in most movie reviews I’ve written. Why? Because at this point, expectations regarding these have already been established by the previous installments. If you’ve seen Ghost Protocol and Rogue Nation, then your standards for this have pretty much been set in stone. The characters are the same, the story structure and flow is fairly similar, and the humor is just as to be expected of a Mission Impossible film. There’s nothing too much in each installment that makes them heavily stand out from one another (except perhaps the earlier titles). You have Benji, a Simon Pegg stereotype. Luther, a Ving Rhames stereotype. And Ilsa, a typical badass chick stereotype. And there’s M… I mean Alan Hanley, who is basically Adam Baldwin being Adam Baldwin.

The best element of these works is always the action. And surprisingly, I found the action set pieces this time around to be rather dry. We start off with an uninspired shootout in an underpass, which reminded me heavily of the film Ronin. Then we move on to a rather semi-brutal brawl in a bathroom in Paris, which got my adrenaline flowing slightly but felt too much like a watered-down version of that one scene from the opening of Casino Royale (which despite its pg-13 rating, managed to be so much more stomach churning). Then there’s a generic car chase, followed up by another generic chase, this time on foot. The only standout sequence here was a helicopter battle between Hunt and one of the antagonists. That’s all. Out of multiple action sequences throughout the film, only one stood out to me. And even then, it’s nothing compared to the Burj Khalifa sequence from Ghost Protocol, or the opera house attack in Rogue Nation.

mission impossible 2
Never get into a fist fight with a bearded Superman.

But still, I gotta give credit to Tom Cruise for doing all those stunts himself. This guy doesn’t need a stunt double to do the job, he can just do it all himself. Running across the rooftops in London, chasing down baddies in a luxurious vehicle, sky diving at an altitude of over 12,000 feet? It’s most likely all done by Cruise himself in real time. And honestly, I’m impressed; the guys in his 50s and is still able to perform feats any ordinary human being would be hesitant to join in. It’s great too; saves a lot of cold hard-earned cash in the end. There’s also more footage of Tom Cruise running from one place to the next in this film. It’s gotten to the point where it’s become some sort of a meme. Man, the rumours are all true, this guy never skips leg day.

Now the biggest improvement to this film is its use of tension. Mission Impossible 3 is my all-time favourite in the franchise thus far because of how high the stakes were. In that film, Ethan was on the verge of death, and you can feel how vulnerable he is as a character. The concept of the main character having a literal bomb shoved into his skull, with the main villain threatening to detonate it whenever he wants to, does wonders in showing that not even the main lead is safe. No one could tell whether he’d live to see another day or perish in the process. It’s also what pissed me off about the latter two movies. Ghost Protocol and Rogue Nation both suffered from the notion that there was practically no tension present at all. At no point did you ever think any of these characters were going to get injured or die at all, and it more felt like it was playing it safe than anything else. Fallout thankfully, brought back some of the stakes. I mean the whole point of this sequel is that Hunt royally effed up by sparing the life of Solomon Lane, the antagonist from the previous film. Now him and his Syndicate group are plotting to launch nukes on various territories from across the globe as part of their terrorist campaign. Awesome, now various nations from across the globe are at stake if Hunt and co ends up failing the mission. And I know you’re all going to say how its likely that no nukes are gonna be launched, but in an era where Infinity War exists and is a box office maniac, we’d never know.

mission impossible 3
The classic wire handing scene; a staple of all Mission Impossible films.

But alas, the film still plays it safe in many areas. It still feels too familiar to the previous three titles in places and there’s not much to dig out of its storyline. You would have thought that by introducing nukes, we’d get some political strife of some sort? Nope, nada. This ain’t Winter Soldier bros. Plus Solomon Lane ends up being the generic baddie that was established in the previous film. There’s no sense of personality or depth to his character at all, and you could easily confuse him for a typical Bond villain.

Also, the biggest problem in this film is that there are like a dozen or so fake outs. Oh, someone there just detonated a nuke! Whoops, fake out, turns out it was all just a trick! Oh no, somebody just killed a major character! Haha fooled you, it turns out he was decoy! Oh no, Superman just ripped Goku’s head clean off! Ha fooled you again, it was Vegeta in disguise! Whatever level of tension that had been established was abruptly removed because of these fake outs. I would be okay with it if it were done once or twice, but over 5 times? Now that’s just too excessive. A bad guy getting unmasked would feel like your average Scooby Doo episode. Might as well just call this film, Mission Impossible Fake out instead. It’s a shame though, because most of the stakes that were established were soon outright removed because of the idea that audiences realize they’re constantly being tricked every now and then. Tone down the trolling for the next title, jeez.

mission impossible 4
“This is for Martha”

Overall Mission Impossible Fallout is a semi-passable action flick that will give you a boost to your adrenaline occasionally. It may not be as exhilarating or as innovative as action flicks such as Mad Max Fury Road or The Raid, but you’ll still be able to have a blast watching it at the theatres. It’s a watchable one-timer as a result. However, it highly pales in comparison to the third Mission Impossible film, which still retains its place on the throne in my opinion of course (most people will instantly disagree with me on this statement). So, thank you, JJ Abrams, for creating a spy flick that’s actually memorable and tense, unlike the other instalments in the franchise. But seriously bro, tone it down a bit with the lens flare, you’re starting to make Michael Bay look like Alfred Hitchcock in comparison.

Also, what’s with playing the theme song over clips from the very movie at the beginning and before the end credits? I mean sure it sounds catchy and all, but it’s Mission Impossible not Hawaii Five-0. You don’t have to do the same thing you did in the intro sequence for the end credits too. Though I’ll admit the song is pretty much an ear worm at this point. Dun dun da da dun dun da da dun dun da da dun dun da da. Dunana, dunana, dunana, dada. Dunanaaa, dunanaaa, dunanaaa dana. Danaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! Okay I’ll see myself out…

Final verdict: 6/10

Advertisements

6 Replies to “Mission Impossible Fallout review – Fake outs upon fake outs!”

  1. I have to respectfully disagree on this one. For me, it did everything I enjoyed about Rogue Nation, and bumped up the action side of it. Though, you do a good job explaining your points against the movie. Something I still see amateur reviewers I’ve know doing this for years still not do all that well.

    Speaking of Mad Max: Fury Road, I didn’t find that movie that be great as it critical reception made it out to be. It would be equal to your problem with Fallout, but instead of fake outs there’s the dumb characters, and poor story that prevented me from enjoying it. Same with the same action I found repetitive. The Raid though, I do agree it’s a great flick, even if it’s sequel quality is severely overblown I feel. Although, I if ramble about The Raid 2 writing I might be here forever haha.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Personally, I would have liked Fallout a lot more if it weren’t for said fake outs. Probably would have ended up as a 7/10 in the end if it didn’t have that issue. It just kinda annoyed me that a movie that was supposed to be about a mistake Ethan did in the past, there barely were any consequences to it. The beginning actually got me kinda hyped because three places were revealed to be nuked, but then it turns out it was just a trick lol.

      Oh boy, is The Raid 2 really that bad? I’ve been itching to watch it.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. As for that scene you mentioned, I sorta expected that given the series doesn’t deviate from it’s formula. I do recall reading they were originally going to make a darker movie, but went a different route instead. Given how much you like MI: 3, and it being the closest Ethan Hunt actually came to dying (well, other than Rouge Nation where Hunt nearly drowned to death) that point still stand. Makes it easier to see where you come from since after that, they fully embraced the route of pure blockbuster entertainment with some crazy Tom Cruise stunts.

        I wouldn’t call The Raid 2 a bad movie, but it’s not nearly as good as the first one I feel. The Raid 2 is more ambitious in everything with bigger scale action scenes, and a larger cast of characters. Gareth H. Evans isn’t able to balance everything on the story front so it looses momentum as it goes on, and there’s also some noticeable error in some of the action scenes.

        There’s one sequence in a porn den where in the background, actor Iko Uwais is just standing wailing around his arms waiting for an actor off screen to attack him. It wouldn’t be noticeable if that moment had tighter editing. In the first movie, half the time Iko needs other people help him to get through a dangerous situation whereas in The Raid 2 Iko is basically like a one man army removing any semblance of stakes for me. There’s also some other stuff, but it’s a decent flick overall, though a bit disappointing.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. 😂😂😂 “semi passable action flick” Ya… That’s pretty much what I was expecting. I will also give Tom Cruise kudos for doing his own stunts. That’s always really impressive! But… Why did they need a SIXTH Mission Impossible?!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s